![]() Readcube was originally created by Labtiva which is now part of Digital Science. I don’t know whether Readcube has similar ties to any publishers exposing the text edit fields to the macOS kernel so that we can run transformations or service options on them).įWIW, the Papers iPad app appears also to be nicely done. I am starting a list of requests on the Papers support forum to push for this as well as other features as I run across them (e.g. I would not have to carry around my reference database from more than a decade just to work on a new journal article. The one downside is that I could do what I might call “light-weight” syncing in Bookends. ![]() I have reached the moment of enlightenment … Grasshopper, it is time for you to go. Try figuring out whether the paperclip icon in Bookends means there IS a valid attachment or there once WAS an attachment (but it is not here and you will have to go find it manually … (in a second window somewhere else)).→ NOT POSSIBLE (you have to select files, mark them, and the use a menu option to export the hit list). Try selecting a set of references in the main panel and exporting them as a.Try sorting a list in the main panel to reveal files that have attachments or not.The friction for me to do simple things in Bookends was glaring. After using it for a few hours simply to align two of my databases between it and Bookends, I noticed something significant. I have an exhaustive database in it from about a decade of effort. ![]() I’ve had a moment to return to ReadCube Papers. Rather, if they need an adjective, I would perhaps say that they are “telling”, because they tell the reader quite a bit about how the interaction went which was, as mentioned earlier, exactly my intention with providing them. I wouldn’t use the word “demean” in those cases, though, but “reporting”.Īlso, I wouldn’t call the details I posted “gory”, as it seems to imply some kind of voyeuristic intent (and, in the present context, that they were unnecessary). But perhaps this is precisely where our disagreement lies: you seem to think that it is never okay “ to cause someone to become less respected” (and hence, giving oneself permission to do so is basically a pseudo-permission, not a legitimate justification), whereas I think that if someone conducts themselves in a way that is suitable to cause them to become less respected, then it can very well be justified to make this known. In my ears, the phrase “give oneself the permission to demean” is somewhat awkward because demeaning someone is generally seen as something that you should not do, yet the phrase suggests that it might be permitted under certain circumstances. So are you saying that when someone conducts themselves in a way that is suitable to demean themselves, it is my obligation to protect them from that? Oh, that’s an interesting way of putting it. Regard carefully please that my alternative view is that you are posting the gory details in order to give yourself permission to demean.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |